아름다운 산하와 살맛나는 국토 Beautiful Nature, Delightful Living Space

연구보고서

  • 발간물
  • 연구보고서

국토분야 정보의 공유를 위해 연구보고서 원문정보를 제공하고 있습니다.

트위터 페이스북
연구보고서 상세보기 : 제목, 연구진, 보고서번호, 발행일, 페이지수, 과제구분, 첨부파일 및 상세내용을 제공합니다.
제목 [KRIHS SPECIAL REPORT 30] A Study on the Development and Utilization of Housing Welfare Evaluation Indicators
연구진 Mina Kang 
보고서번호 Special Report30 발행일 20160630
페이지수 51 과제구분 기타
첨부파일 파일첨부0000080961.pdf
[KRIHS SPECIAL REPORT 30] A Study on the Development and Utilization of Housing Welfare Evaluation Indicators표지
[초록] This study aims to develop national perception housing welfare evaluation indicators
that assess the standard of universal housing welfare. To this end, this study begins
with the definition of \"universal housing welfare\"; clarifies its scope, target, method and
attributes based on such a definition; presents newly developed national perception
housing welfare evaluation indicators; and outlines methods for use and how to
produce and manage them. A wide range of research methods were applied: review
of preceding research, overseas case studies and existing research results; expert and
public opinion surveys and the expertise of the advisory committee.
There is no standard definition for housing welfare. As people\''s interest and policy
agenda have shifted from selective to universal welfare, the term employed in this study
includes the \"universal\" feature. With this in mind and based on the research of KRIHS
experts and other professionals in related areas, the concept and scope of universal
housing welfare have been determined; consequently, for the purpose of this paper, it is
defined as enjoying residential conditions in which every member of society can pursue
health and happiness.
The six attributes relevant for the research within the boundaries of universal housing
welfare are amenity, affordability, stability, convenience, health and safety for home and
the seven amenities, affordability, stability, convenience, health, safety and community are
for housing environment. The public opinion survey was based on these classifications
and additional sub-components.
Based on expert research and reviews of overseas indicators, 25 indicators were
selected (14 for home and 11 for housing environment) to develop new indicators for
people-perceived housing welfare evaluation. The home section is categorized into
areas and the housing environment section into the four areas of amenity, convenience,
health and safety. These are included in the two sections, though with different
indicators.
국토연구원_

[목차] summary 04
chapter 1. background and purpose of research 07
chapter ii. definition and types of housing welfare evaluation indicators
1. d efinition of universal housing welfare 09
2. attributes of universal housing welfare 10
chapter iii. existing housing welfare evaluation indicators and problems
1. t ypes and special features of existing housing welfare 12
evaluation indicators
2. c urrent use of existing housing welfare evaluation indicators 13
3. p roblems of the existing housing welfare evaluation indicators 15
chapter iv. housing welfare evaluation indicators of other nations
1. housing welfare evaluation indicators in u.s. 18
2. h ousing welfare evaluation indicators in u.k. 20
3. implications of foreign case studies 22
chapter v. development of national perception housing welfare
evaluation indicators
1. development process of new housing welfare evaluation 24
indicators
2. c lassification of new indicators 25
3. p ublic opinion survey for constructing national perception 26
housing welfare evaluation indicators
4. n ewly developed housing welfare evaluation indicators 37
5. p roduction and management of new housing welfare 41
evaluation indicators
6. n ational perception housing welfare evaluation indicators in need of 44
development
chapter vi. implications for developing countries
1. p riority list: essential statistics and indicators to assess people\''s 45
h ousing standard
2. p roduction of ive indicators for housing and policy environment 46
3. e xpand from producing ive indicators to producing subjective 47
indicators
4. e stablish institutional foundation to ensure accurate statistics 48
references 49